Europe's Agricultural Revolution

Europe's Agricultural Revolutionbe overlyconcerned if Poland did not enter the EU
together with the firstgroup of new members."
Author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited"Hungary echoes this argument. Almost two thirds of
The June 2005 budget summit in Brussels founderedrespondents insurveys conducted by the EU in Estonia,
on the issue offarm support and subsidies which nowLatvia, Slovenia and
consume directly 46.2% of theLithuania are undecided about EU membership or
European Union's (EU) funds. Tony Blair refused to letopposed to italtogether. The situation in the Czech
go ofRepublic is not muchimproved. Only Hungary stalwartly
Britain's infamous rebate (amounting to two thirds of itssupports the EU's eastern tilt.
netcontributions to the community's coffers) unless andOpinion polls periodically conducted by GfK Hungaria, a
until thesehandouts (which Britain's dilapidatedmarketresearch group owned by GfK Germany, paint
agriculture does not enjoy)are slashed. This followeda more mixed picture. Onthe one hand, even in
close on the hills of the rejection ofthe proposed EUcountries with a devout following of EUaccession, such
constitution in French and the Dutch referenda inas Romania, support for integration has declinedthis
May-June 2005.year. Support in Hungary and Poland, on the other
One of the undeniable benefits of the enlargement ofhand, pickedup.
the EuropeanYet, the EU can't seem to get its act together.
Union (EU) accrues to its veteran members ratherAccording to the
than to theacceding countries. The EU is forced toDanish paper, Berlingske Tidende, Danish prime minister
revamp its costlyagricultural policies and attendantin 2002,
bloated bureaucracy. This,undoubtedly, will lead, albeitAnders Fogh Rasmussen, ruled out a "take it or leave
glacially, to the demise of Europe'sfarming sector asit" ultimatumto the new members. There will be "real
we know it.negotiations", he insisted.
Contrary to public misperceptions, Europe is far moreNot so, says Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish
open to tradethan the United States. According to thepresident of the EUuntil Dec 31, 2002: "The room for
United Nations (UN), themaneuver in negotiations will bevery limited ... We have
International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organizationa certain framework, and we stick to it."
of EconomicYet, disenchantment should not be exaggerated.
Cooperation and Development (OECD), its exportsNaturally, flood- affected farmers throughout the region
amount to 14 percentof gross domestic product (GDP)- from the Czech Republic to
compared to America's 11.5 percent.Poland - are vigorously protesting their unequal
It is also the world's second largest importer. Intreatment and thecompromises their governments
constant dollarterms, it is the world's largest trader.were arm-twisted into making. Still,according to a
A Trade Policy Review released in 2002 by the Worldsurvey released in December 2001 by the European
TradeCommission, 60 percent of the denizens of the
Organization (WTO) mentions two notable exceptions:accession countriessupported it.
farm productsand textiles. Europe's average tariff onAs the endgame nears, the parties to the negotiations
agricultural produce isfour times those levied onare posturing,though. EU enlargement commissioner,
non-agricultural goods. Yet, a number oftrends conspireGunter Verheugen, argued in
to break the eerie stranglehold of 3-4 percent ofNovember 2002 against equalizing support for Poland's
Europe's population - its farmers - on its budget and6 millionfarmers with the subsidies given to the EU's 8
politicalprocess.million smallholders.
The introduction of the euro rendered pricesIn a typical feat of incongruity he said it will prevent
transparent acrossborders and revealed to thethem frommodernizing and alienate other professions.
European consumer how expensive his foodis. ScaresFranz Fischler, the Austrian EU's agriculture
like the mishandled mad cow disease dentedcommissioner, hintedthat miserly production quotas for
consumerconfidence in both politicians and bureaucrats.cereals, meat and dairy products,offered by the EU to
But, most crucially,the integration of the countries ofthe new members, can be augmented. The
east and central Europe withtheir massive agriculturalEUpresently provides the new members with funding,
sectors makes the EU's Commonwithin the Special
Agricultural Policy (CAP) untenable.Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural
The CAP guzzles close to half of the EU's $98 billionDevelopment (SAPARD)to support farm investments,
budget.to boost processing and marketing offarm and fishery
Recent, controversial reforms, introduced by theproducts and to bankroll infrastructureimprovements.
EuropeanHungarian farmers, for instance, are entitled to up to
Commission, call for a gradual reduction and diversion$38 million of SAPARD money annually.
of CAPoutlays from directly subsidizing production toIn a thinly veiled threat, Fischler included this in a speech
WTO-compatibleinvestments in agriculturalhemade in an official visit to Estonia in late 2002:
employment, regional development,environment and"The EU enlargement countries should be pleased with
training and research. Unnoticed, support to farmersbythe 25 per centagriculture subsidies, as the member
both the EU and member governments has alreadystates have not agreed even onthat yet, therefore this
declined from $120billion in 1999 to $110 billion in 2000.should be the first goal and only afterthat can further
This decrease has sincecontinued unabated.subsidies be discussed ... It would not be verywise to
Still, the EU is unable to provide the new members withtell the EU member states that accession countries
the samelevel of farm subsidies it doles out to theare notpleased, that would not be positive for the
current 15 members.whole process."
Close to one quarter of Poland's population is directlySmall wonder he was whistled down by irate Polish
orindirectly involved in agriculture - ten times theparliamentariansin an address to a joint session of the
European average.parliamentary committees foragriculture and European
The agreement struck between Germany and Franceintegration in the Sejm. Poland's fracturedfarm sector is
in September 2002and adopted in a summit Brussels innotoriously inefficient. With one quarter of thelabor
October freezes CAP spending inits 2006 level untilforce it produces less than 4 percent of GDP. But the
2013.peasantsare well represented in the legislature and
This may further postpone the identical treatmentsoaring unemployment -almost one fifth of all adults -
much coveted bythe applicants. Theoretically, subsidiesmakes every workplace count.
for the farm sectors of thenew members will increaseIn the meantime, the ten new members of the EU
and subsidies flowing to veteran memberswillhave teamed up topresent their case in Brussels. Their
decrease until they are equalized at around 80 percentministers of finance, foreignaffairs and of agriculture,
ofpresent levels throughout the EU by the end of theparliamentary deputies in their financeand farm
next budgetperiod in 2013.committees - all issued and issue common
But, in reality, the entire CAP stands to be renegotiatedstatements,position papers, briefings and memoranda
in 2005-6.of understanding. But noone is inclined to take such
No one can guarantee the outcome of this process,ad-hoc alliances among the candidatecountries
especially whencoupled with the Doha round of tradeseriously. The disparity between their farm sectors
liberalization. The offers madenow to the candidateissuch that it rules out a single voice.
countries are not only mean but alsomeaningless.Moreover, the EU is strained to the limit of its habitual
A tweak by Denmark, the president of the EU in theconsensus- driven decision making. The breakdown of
second half ofthe European mechanism ofdeliberation was brought
2002, to peg support for farmers in the new membersinto sharp relief by the way in which thefuture of the
at two fifthsthe going rate, won a cautious welcomeCAP was decided in a series of chats between
by the then candidatecountries. Some of this noveltheleaders of France and Germany in a hotel in
subventionary largesse will bededucted from a fundBrussels in 2002 . Theirdeal was later rubber stamped,
for rural development in the new members.unaltered, in a summit of all EUmembers in October
Additionally, national governments will be allowed to top2002.
upinadequate EU dollops with governmental budgetThe Union is in constitutional and institutional flux. Small
funds.andeven medium sized members - such as the United
Even this parsimonious offer - still disputed by theKingdom - aremarginalized. As the EU bloated to 25
majority ofcontemporary EU members - will cost thecountries, a core ofleadership failed to emerge.
Union an extra $500 milliona year. It also fails to tackleGermany, France, the UK, and Italy -the industrial
equally weighty wrangles aboutproduction quotas, EUlocomotives of Europe - are at odds and (with
protectionist "safeguard" measures, importtariffstheexception of the UK) sputtering.
imposed by the new members against heavilyDecision-making has been reduced to the Council of
subsidizedMinisters handingdown blueprints to be fleshed out by
European farm products, reduced value added taxesthe less significant states andby an increasingly
on agriculturalproduce and referential periods and yieldssidelined European Commission and a make-believe
- the bases forcalculating EU transfers.European Parliament. The constitution which was
It also ignores the distinct - and thorny - possibility thatsupposed to restorecentral authority and participatory
the newmembers will end up as net contributors to thedemocracy is dead in the water.
budget.The countries of central and eastern Europe are and
Quoted by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Sandorwill, for a longtime, be second class citizens, tolerated
Richter, a seniorresearcher with the Vienna Institute formerely because theyprovide cheap, youthful, labor, raw
International Economicmaterials and close-by marketsfor finished goods. The
Studies, concluded that the first intake of ten newnew members are strategically locatedbetween the
members,concluded in May 2004, will end upold continent and booming Asia.
underwriting at least $410million of the EU's budget inEU enlargement is a thinly disguised exercise in
the first year of membership alone.mercantilism tingedwith the maudlin ideology of
With the GDP per capita of most candidates at oneembracing revenant brothers long lostto communism.
fifth the EU's,this would be a perverse, sociallyBut beneath the veneer of civility and kultur lurk thecold
unsettling and politicallyexplosive outcome.calculations of realpolitik. The New Europe - the
Aware of this, the European Commission denies anyEU'shinterland - would do well to remember this.
intention toactually accept cash from the New Europe.==================
Their net contributionswould remain theoretical, itAUTHOR BIO (must be included with the article)
pledges implausibly. Yet, as long as acountry such asSam Vaknin ( ) is the author of Malignant
Poland is incapable of absorbing - disseminatingSelf Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain -
andutilizing - more than 28 percent of the aid it isHow the West
currently entitledto - veteran EU members rightlyLost the East. He served as a columnist for Central
question its administrative abilityto tackle much largerEurope Review,
provisions - c. $20 billion in the first threeyears afterPopMatters, Bellaonline, and eBookWeb, a United
accession.Press International
The prolonged and irascible debate has taken its toll. In(UPI) Senior Business Correspondent, and the editor of
some newmember countries, pro-EU sentiment is onmental healthand Central East Europe categories in
the wane. Leszek Miller,then Poland's prime minister,The Open Directory and
told the PAP news agency in late 2002that PolandSuite101.
should contribute to the EU less than it receivesUntil recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to
inagricultural subsidies. And what if not? "Nobody wouldthe Governmentof Macedonia.